What guides the project
This is not fact-checking
MethodologyCriteria from specialists
Social science specialists at Sleeping Giants Brasil write the criteria. Each one describes a disinformative narrative that recurs in the Brazilian debate.
TransparencyEvery verdict shows its reason
A verdict carries the literal excerpt from the article, the criterion tied to it and a justification. Readers can check it and disagree.
Human reviewIt flags, it does not decide
The system points to what deserves a closer read and does not check whether the facts are true. Analysts review the verdicts, and changes are tested on cases reviewed by the specialists.
AxesGender and sexualityEthnic-racialDemocratic stabilityEnvironmentHealth